|
|
Post by patyrn on Oct 9, 2011 15:33:43 GMT -5
I'm not particularly interested in playing MvM, but I like the idea of more fighter varieties.
Is MvM designed to be balanced if you just drop its fighters in a CB ship?
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDreadnought on Oct 9, 2011 16:58:37 GMT -5
Yeah, you should be able to use the fighter profiles from MvM with no problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by patyrn on Oct 9, 2011 21:06:39 GMT -5
Is that also true of:
New fighter abilities like microjump, boarding, and computer-infiltration attacks
A new fighter type - the gunship
2 new starship roles - the Battlecarrier, and the Raider
Expanded rules for boarding actions
?
|
|
|
|
Post by warchariot on Oct 9, 2011 23:26:15 GMT -5
Is that also true of: New fighter abilities like microjump, boarding, and computer-infiltration attacks A new fighter type - the gunship 2 new starship roles - the Battlecarrier, and the Raider Expanded rules for boarding actions ? Yep, it all should work without a problem. We have carried these over and Dread plays different Universes against each other. In fact, he did a BSG vs SW battle at cons. |
|
|
|
Post by patyrn on Oct 10, 2011 0:03:07 GMT -5
Hmm reading this the battlecarrier seems to invalidate both the gunline and the carrier roles. Is this meant to replace both those roles in MvM?
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDreadnought on Oct 10, 2011 9:15:31 GMT -5
It doesn't get the full benefits of either, its more of a blend. That said, its probably a better deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by warchariot on Oct 10, 2011 20:03:57 GMT -5
It doesn't get the full benefits of either, its more of a blend. That said, its probably a better deal. If you carry a lot of fighters it's a good deal. But you are trading guns for fighters. A lot of people here don't believe that is a good trade.  |
|
